I disagree with you bigseb
For Engineering scope it has add-on like RhinoMarine or Rhino parametric and is super more effective and cost less than Alibre. I have hope in AD but still is so poor in everyday productive software.Moi is insufficient. Only shapes and the ex-Rhino Michael Gibson.know that.
Apples and oranges. Moi isn't marketed as an engineering package. A snip from the website:
MoI’s sleek intuitive UI blends a fluid easy workflow with powerful tools, making it the perfect choice for someone who has been frustrated with the complexity of existing CAD tools.
MoI is also a fantastic complementary tool for a polygon-based artist since its CAD toolset and advanced boolean functions enable extremely rapid creation of mechanical or man-made type “hard surface” models. The icing on the cake is MoI’s unique polygon mesh export that generates exceptionally clean and crisp N-Gon polygon meshes from CAD NURBS models.
Got a tough shape to model? Moi is
by far the 'easiest to use' tool there is.
By. Far.
As far as engineering tools go... Catia, Creo, NX, Solidedge, Solidworks, Inventor AND Alibre are miles ahead of Rhino in terms of being an engineering solution. Have you seen the state of Rhino's drawings? Talk about a non-associative waste of paper. Or how about the non-ability to create BOMs. That model of the ship... looks pretty eighties tbh. And is that Jeremy, James and Hammond on board?
Not saying Rhino is bad. Its good software, provided you stay within its limitations. Can you design a boat or an injection mould or a coal-fired power plant in Rhino? Probably. Is it the best tool for that sort of work? No. Neither is Moi, but that was never its claim.
FUN FACT: McNeel originally specialized in writing add-ons for CAD software before buying then-employee Michael Gibson's code for a CAD program. This code became Rhino. Michael then left McNeel to focus on his own software which is now called Moi. If anyone know the limitations of both Moi and Rhino it's Michael Gibson.