To be clear, Dynamic Simulation Technologies should stay away from things they do not understand!
I will suggest to make technical questions to
support@design-simulation.com for serious investigations before coming to such conclusion.
Let me point You out what I mean with a classical example in
http://www.simwise4d.it/CONTATTO.WM3 (download a demo of SimWise from
http://www.simwise4d.it/SimWiseAlibreEN.htm in case You need the code to run it).
The final result out of the drop of the green (verde) and blue (blu) balls is the same, but clearly the story (transition) to reach it is completely different depending on the two different contact models (impulse and custom) used in the same simulation.
If You are looking ONLY for the final deformation of the beam due to the weight of the ball, then both approaches are fine, the impulse model beeing much faster and easier than the other.
But it is clear that such final deformation is not the biggest one during transition, so to model the force distribution vs. time during contact a custom model is proposed assuming very small deformations of the beam.
But of course even this second approach doesn't include the fact that, due to the much bigger deformations of the beam, the ball doesn't jump in the same vertical line but start moving behind and falling out of the beam.
So in this case neither of the two approaches can hit the goal of investigating where the ball will finally go. But even this third case can be simulated as well with this software (is part of the training we can provide), modeling a flexible beam instead of a rigid body in SimWise, so I cannot conclude that this software cannot make the required simulation (finding where the ball will go and the story of deformations of the beam). Of course within the limits of the material properties and modelization of it (linear, non-linear, etc.).
Therefore, my conclusion is that:
- first, think about what are the mathematical models that can accurately describe the aspect of the simulation You are looking for;
- second, select the most efficient and simple mathematical model to reach such goal;
- third, ask the developers if such mathematical model is built in the software You are selecting (if You don't have enough documentation to check by yourself).
Ciao!
P.S.
I placed some other models to rise up curiosity about simplified approaches to typical issues in:
www.simwise4d.it/BALL_FAN_VECT.WM3
www.simwise4d.it/COASTER.WM3
www.simwise4d.it/PSNAP_WITH_ROLLER.WM3
www.simwise4d.it/PRODUCTION_LINE_CONVEYORS.WM3
www.simwise4d.it/TELAIO.WM3
For example, please enjoy travelling with the camera inside the tubes of TELAIO while deforming, to see the simplified (and automatic!) solution for the welding thickness.
What is up to You, again, is to justify if the model is adequate for Your needs, balancing time, economical investment and precision, which is not as simple as a keystroke!