I find it odd that the Maker community is trying to rebrand him as some sort of pioneer or hero. I think his story is the worst case scenario failure of IP law as a whole.
3DS had a 25 year head start on a 2 billion dollar a year industry, but they were so myopic about their business they completely squandered it, never being more than a few hundred million dollar a year company. They had lighting in a bottle, but were unable or unwilling to sell it to anyone at a price where they could actually make money from it themselves.
So instead, all of society had to wait 25 years for the patents to expire before the community at large could finally derive benefit from the technology.
I'm in favor of IP law and patents in general. To me this is a glaring edge case where the assumption that the folks that have the patent know enough to maximize it and exploit it to its fullest potential broke down. Chuck Hull and 3D Systems should be examined as a warning to others, not as some kind of hero.